No spoilers from me, but one link below has some minor ones.
If you want to see an amazing movie this year, go see Avatar. And if you found yourself enjoying the flick not many will be surprised as it’s rolling in the dough.
Avatar grosses $1 Billion:
James Cameron’s Avatar continued its reign at the box office for the third week in a row. The film grossed $68.3 million domestically and surpassed the $1 billion mark worldwide, only the fifth film in history to do that.
Avatar has grossed $352.1 million domestically in only 17 days and has made $1.02 billion worldwide. 20th Century Fox distribution executive Bert Livingston attributed the continued strong showing to positive word-of-mouth and repeat viewers. Most blockbusters open big and then slowly die off in the coming weeks while Avatar’s gross has been consistent from week to week.
And it’s not done yet. It hasn’t opened in Italy. So expect this film to impress with numbers when all is said and done. But why are so many people going to see it? For the opposite reasons people hated the Star Wars prequels (the 3 that came out in the last 10 years). Click here for the epic review of the crappy flicks (well really just the first one needs to be reviewed).
It’s hard to boil down such a great 70 minute review as the one linked above, but if I had to I would say this: 1) a movie needs not only great characters and character development, but a main one too. 2) Sometimes simplicity is more. 3) Never base a movie around action sequences, instead use those sequences to highlight the story and plight of the characters.
You need a main character in a story so that there is something that drags you into the story and gives you a reason to care. While it’s possible to have multiple main characters, most stories have a focal point which makes it easier for the audience to be in the story and have empathy for the main character. And the reasoning is simple. If there is a main character to feel for and have an emotional attachment to you feel their wins but also their loses. Avatar had one main character that was the focus of the story and developed this character well. The other characters fit well too and didn’t seem out of place with the story. They also didn’t steal the show from the main character leaving us confused as to who is the main character.
Simplicity is explained in the movie review linked above when the reviewer shows us the opening sequence of Star Wars 4 (the one that came out in the 70s). The infamous Battleship scene. One simple scene of visual imagery sets the stage and gives us an idea about the struggle this movie portrays. Avatar had these types of scenes as well. Some to show us the protagonist, some to show off the good guys, and others. And they were all done as they needed to be, not over hyped with action.
One thing the Star Wars prequels weren’t missing was action. And while Avatar had plenty of action scenes and visual imagery, it also had a great story and characters that pulled you into that story. Without this the actions scenes and visual imagery don’t really hold up. After watching the Star Wars prequels you get the sense the movie was created around some “awesome” action scene ideas. I didn’t feel this way although other reviewers out there did. My reasoning is simple, the action scenes just weren’t overdone. They showed what they needed to and then the movie kept rolling. The end fight scene between good and evil wasn’t over done or over choreographed like it was in the Star Wars prequel.
Another thing Avatar had going was the acting, which Cameron can partly thank technology for. The acting was good because the characters actually acted out the scenes, even the digital ones and got to see their facial expressions in real time. Instead of creating CGI representations of actors and program the computer to have those representatives fly around with predetermined emotions, the actors emotions and full body movements were captured in real time and sent into a digital environment. But it gets better as they created a virtual camera that was used to film shots from a third perspective that could be moved around as needed. This easily allowed the director to control virtual points of view without having to interact with a computer or computer software directly.
With Avatar very little if anything felt forced and the action and visual imagery floated along seamlessly with the story. While I’m sure there were some scenes Cameron just had to have and maybe even fitted into the story, it all felt natural with the story created.
Using the technology created for Avatar in the Star Wars prequels likely would have made some impact, but great movies have been coming out ever since the first movie was shown in a theater. Technology cannot work the magic required to resurrect the awfulness of the Star Wars prequels.
I walked out of the theater with my wife and she said to me, “You know even without the 3D that movie still would have been good.” I totally agree with her. And maybe down the road that will be our measure for 3D flicks.