Michael: He defends them to a point. He seems critical, but it appears he didn’t attempt to go find the root cause of why the Bush Administration did what they did. He comes off as, “Well they did this and this and this, but it was not with direct intent. So in other words Scott is using his skills he learned while working with Bush to play word games.

Which does indeed seem odd. Maybe he thinks he can still work for the Republicans at some level, I’m not really sure why he just doesn’t speak the truth or how he really feels. Hell maybe he’s deluded and truly believes Bush didn’t invade Iraq with intent. Someone I find the latter hard to believe.