<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indoctrination: Is it Necessary for Organizational Survival?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webs05.com/2008/04/30/indoctrination-is-it-necessary-for-organizational-survival.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webs05.com/2008/04/30/indoctrination-is-it-necessary-for-organizational-survival.html</link>
	<description>Life From a Grad Student's Perspective</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Webs</title>
		<link>http://www.webs05.com/2008/04/30/indoctrination-is-it-necessary-for-organizational-survival.html#comment-6101</link>
		<dc:creator>Webs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 15:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webs05.com/?p=409#comment-6101</guid>
		<description>I think I would certainly agree Dana. Organized religion needs a system of indoctrination to survive. Without it people will lose interest over time and start to not care. But spirituality needs no system of any kind since it's derived from within.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I would certainly agree Dana. Organized religion needs a system of indoctrination to survive. Without it people will lose interest over time and start to not care. But spirituality needs no system of any kind since it&#8217;s derived from within.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.webs05.com/2008/04/30/indoctrination-is-it-necessary-for-organizational-survival.html#comment-6100</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 05:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webs05.com/?p=409#comment-6100</guid>
		<description>Short answer: no.  I mean, yes.  I mean, argh!  Two questions, different answers.

No, it can't survive without indoctrination.  Which means yes, it's necessary.

Now the longer answer: any human enterprise only lasts as long as other people are used to it.  That's why advertisers try to drum up interest in specific products, why charities try to drum up interest in specific good works, and why men try to get women dru - ah, I mean, drum up women's interest in them (yes, I'm kidding on that last bit).  People can be "religious" and "spiritual" without indoctrination.  However, organized religion can't survive without it.

Look at the poor Greek Pantheon.  The Egyptian.  Bunch o' others.  Setting aside the starry-eyed New Agey types trying to revive those religions, they're dead, Jim.  And I'd say it's because folks stopped indoctrinating other folks, at least in part.

Sure, there's other reasons for their decline.  Absolutely.  But if nobody recruits for the faith, the faith is going to wither.  So will any other enterprise that doesn't at least semi-actively go after new bodies, or make new bodies to replace old ones.  

In my not-so-humble-opinion.  

 :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short answer: no.  I mean, yes.  I mean, argh!  Two questions, different answers.</p>
<p>No, it can&#8217;t survive without indoctrination.  Which means yes, it&#8217;s necessary.</p>
<p>Now the longer answer: any human enterprise only lasts as long as other people are used to it.  That&#8217;s why advertisers try to drum up interest in specific products, why charities try to drum up interest in specific good works, and why men try to get women dru - ah, I mean, drum up women&#8217;s interest in them (yes, I&#8217;m kidding on that last bit).  People can be &#8220;religious&#8221; and &#8220;spiritual&#8221; without indoctrination.  However, organized religion can&#8217;t survive without it.</p>
<p>Look at the poor Greek Pantheon.  The Egyptian.  Bunch o&#8217; others.  Setting aside the starry-eyed New Agey types trying to revive those religions, they&#8217;re dead, Jim.  And I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s because folks stopped indoctrinating other folks, at least in part.</p>
<p>Sure, there&#8217;s other reasons for their decline.  Absolutely.  But if nobody recruits for the faith, the faith is going to wither.  So will any other enterprise that doesn&#8217;t at least semi-actively go after new bodies, or make new bodies to replace old ones.  </p>
<p>In my not-so-humble-opinion.  </p>
<p> <img src='http://www.webs05.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.webs05.com/2008/04/30/indoctrination-is-it-necessary-for-organizational-survival.html#comment-6074</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webs05.com/?p=409#comment-6074</guid>
		<description>indoctrination = socialization. Depends on who sees the benefits and how they frame it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>indoctrination = socialization. Depends on who sees the benefits and how they frame it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
